Ferdinando Monte

1.5k citations
9 papers · 883 · 1 hit paper · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Ferdinando Monte

9 papers receiving 798 citations

Ferdinando Monte's Hit Papers

Culture, Gender, and Math 2008 · 709 citations
7090+6+12Years since publication200400600

Peers

Ferdinando Monte
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Safety Research 198
  • Gender Studies 183
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
  • Education 316
  • General Decision Sciences 15
Replace Kevin Denny with:
Kevin Denny Ireland
Sven Oskarsson Sweden
Robert Klemmensen Denmark
Brian Kisida United States
Santiago Sánchez‐Pagés United Kingdom
David Rosé United States
Daniela Glätzle‐Rützler Austria
Roger Clark United States
Thomas R. Robinson United States
Johanna Möllerström United States
Ferdinando Monte relative to Kevin Denny Ireland Kevin Denny's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Kevin Denny · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinando Monte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinando Monte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinando Monte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinando Monte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinando Monte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinando Monte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinando Monte. The network helps show where Ferdinando Monte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Ferdinando Monte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ferdinando Monte Line = papers co-authored together Ferdinando Monte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown

About Ferdinando Monte

Ferdinando Monte is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Urban Studies, Strategy and Management and Molecular Biology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 883 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (4 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (2 papers), Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis (2 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers), International Business and FDI (1 paper), School Choice and Performance (1 paper), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (1 paper) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (198 citations), Gender Studies (183 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations), Education (316 citations) and General Decision Sciences (15 citations). Ferdinando Monte has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Paola Sapienza, Luigi Guiso, Luigi Zingales, Esteban Rossi‐Hansberg, Lorenzo Caliendo, Alessia Vignoli, Angelo Di Leo, Elena Mori, Chiara Biagioni and Laura Biganzoli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Political Economy, Economics Letters, Science, Annals of Oncology and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact