Feng‐Ping Zhang

838 citations
38 papers · 629 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Feng‐Ping Zhang

36 papers receiving 620 citations

Peers

Feng‐Ping Zhang
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 210
  • Plant Science 303
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 70
  • Inorganic Chemistry 72
  • Organic Chemistry 147
Replace Ulrich Lion with:
Ulrich Lion Germany
Weixing Zhang China
M. A. U. Mridha Bangladesh
Michele Bertazzini Italy
Yukari Sunohara Japan
Shen Tan China
Tomasz Andrzej Pawłowski Poland
А. В. Усатов Russia
Chang-En Tian China
R. E. Allan United States
Feng‐Ping Zhang relative to Ulrich Lion Germany Ulrich Lion's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ulrich Lion · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng‐Ping Zhang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng‐Ping Zhang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng‐Ping Zhang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng‐Ping Zhang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng‐Ping Zhang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng‐Ping Zhang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng‐Ping Zhang. The network helps show where Feng‐Ping Zhang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng‐Ping Zhang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng‐Ping Zhang Line = papers co-authored together Feng‐Ping Zhang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201884
2 202062
3 201846
4 201734
5 201134
6 201733
7 202033
8 201731
9 201625
10 201422
11 202222
12 202021
13 201620
14 202116
15 202314
16 202013
17
A species of fig tree and three unrelated fig wasp pollinators
200812
18 201912
19 201212
20 201611

About Feng‐Ping Zhang

Feng‐Ping Zhang is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 38 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (22 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (10 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (6 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (5 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (210 citations), Plant Science (303 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (70 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (72 citations) and Organic Chemistry (147 citations). Feng‐Ping Zhang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Brodribb, Shi‐Bao Zhang, Mengchun Ye, Yu‐Xin Luan, Amanda Á. Cardoso, Qiuyun Yang, Frances C. Sussmilch, Scott A. M. McAdam, David S. Nichols and Gang Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, Organic Letters, Plant Signaling & Behavior, PLoS ONE and New Phytologist.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact