Da‐Rong Yang

1.6k citations
91 papers · 1.1k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Da‐Rong Yang

88 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Da‐Rong Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 836
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 309
  • Insect Science 241
  • Plant Science 562
  • Genetics 330
Replace Ann Smithson with:
Ann Smithson United Kingdom
Hubert Herz Panama
Jim Mant Australia
Yan‐Qiong Peng China
Lisa E. Wallace United States
Jana Jersáková Czechia
Hiroshi S. Ishii Japan
Florent Martos France
J. Túpac Otero Colombia
Giovanni Scopece Italy
Da‐Rong Yang relative to Ann Smithson United Kingdom Ann Smithson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Ann Smithson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Da‐Rong Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Da‐Rong Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Da‐Rong Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Da‐Rong Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Da‐Rong Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Da‐Rong Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Da‐Rong Yang. The network helps show where Da‐Rong Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Da‐Rong Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Da‐Rong Yang Line = papers co-authored together Da‐Rong Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012144
2 201761
3 201152
4
Co-occurrence of two Eupristina species on Ficus altissima in Xishuangbanna, SW China
200851
5 200145
6 201443
7 200637
8 201136
9 199933
10 200931
11 201527
12 200527
13 200523
14 201422
15 200920
16 201120
17 201519
18 201719
19 201917
20 201317

About Da‐Rong Yang

Da‐Rong Yang is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Molecular Biology and Genetics, having authored 91 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (75 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (39 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (39 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (13 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Phytochemistry and biological activities of Ficus species (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (836 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (309 citations), Insect Science (241 citations), Plant Science (562 citations) and Genetics (330 citations). Da‐Rong Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yan‐Qiong Peng, Stephen G. Compton, Chuan Ma, Guangming Zhang, Qishi Song, Cong Liu, Jean–Yves Rasplus, Zongbo Li, Rui‐Wu Wang and Chong‐Ren Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Symbiosis, PLoS ONE, Insect Science, Acta Oecologica and Zootaxa.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact