Felicitas Stuber

592 citations
19 papers · 295 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Felicitas Stuber

19 papers receiving 286 citations

Peers

Felicitas Stuber
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Research and Theory 5
  • General Health Professions 127
  • Clinical Psychology 87
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 26
  • Occupational Therapy 9
Replace Ma Isabel Ríos‐Risquez with:
Ma Isabel Ríos‐Risquez Spain
Carla Cremonese Italy
Emiliana de los Ángeles Sabuco‐Tebar Spain
Christina Purpora United States
Yanli Zeng China
Tanja Seifried-Dübon Germany
Bridget T. Bryan United Kingdom
María Inés Carmona‐Rega Spain
David Lazzari Italy
Barbara Hobbs United States
Felicitas Stuber relative to Ma Isabel Ríos‐Risquez Spain Ma Isabel Ríos‐Risquez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ma Isabel Ríos‐Risquez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felicitas Stuber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felicitas Stuber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felicitas Stuber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felicitas Stuber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felicitas Stuber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felicitas Stuber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felicitas Stuber. The network helps show where Felicitas Stuber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Felicitas Stuber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felicitas Stuber Line = papers co-authored together Felicitas Stuber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201875
2 202056
3 201834
4 201831
5 201815
6 201915
7 202011
8 202211
9 202210
10 202110
11 20189
12 20225
13 20204
14 20233
15 20212
16 20211
17 20201
18 20181
19 20201

About Felicitas Stuber

Felicitas Stuber is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 19 papers that have together received 295 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (8 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (1 paper) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (5 citations), General Health Professions (127 citations), Clinical Psychology (87 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (26 citations) and Occupational Therapy (9 citations). Felicitas Stuber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Florian Junne, Stephan Zipfel, Monika A. Rieger, Harald Gündel, Tanja Seifried-Dübon, Christoph Nikendei, Rebecca Erschens, Anne Herrmann‐Werner, Teresa Loda and Katrin Ziser. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health and International Journal of Eating Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact