F.A. de Wolff
Impact in
- Environmental Chemistry top 5%
- Arsenic contamination and mitigation
-
- Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Papers in
-
- Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity 3
-
- Arsenic contamination and mitigation 3
- Co-authors
- Gijsbert B. van der Voet (6 shared papers)A. Vahidnia (5 shared papers)Fred P.H.T.M. Romijn (3 shared papers)E. Marani (1 shared paper)Jan van Amsterdam (1 shared paper)Antoon Opperhuizen (1 shared paper)William R. Best (1 shared paper)Jos van Pelt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Human & Experimental Toxicology (2 papers)Toxicology in Vitro (2 papers)Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology (1 paper)Chemico-Biological Interactions (1 paper)Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesPakistan
In The Last Decade
F.A. de Wolff
8 papers receiving 393 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Environmental Chemistry 197
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 181
- Nutrition and Dietetics 82
- Electrochemistry 32
- Pollution 43
Countries citing papers authored by F.A. de Wolff
This map shows the geographic impact of F.A. de Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.A. de Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.A. de Wolff more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F.A. de Wolff
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.A. de Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.A. de Wolff. The network helps show where F.A. de Wolff may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside F.A. de Wolff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 260 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 36 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 8 | Correlation of serum aluminium values with tissue aluminium concentration | 1984 | 2 |
About F.A. de Wolff
F.A. de Wolff is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Environmental Chemistry, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 8 papers that have together received 406 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (3 papers), Arsenic contamination and mitigation (3 papers), Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers), Trace Elements in Health (2 papers), Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes (2 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (1 paper) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (197 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (181 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (82 citations), Electrochemistry (32 citations) and Pollution (43 citations). F.A. de Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Gijsbert B. van der Voet, A. Vahidnia, Fred P.H.T.M. Romijn, E. Marani, Jan van Amsterdam, Antoon Opperhuizen, William R. Best, Jos van Pelt, R. Van Grieken and W. J. Visser. Their work appears in journals such as Human & Experimental Toxicology, Toxicology in Vitro, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Chemico-Biological Interactions and Progress in Histochemistry and Cytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.