F. Schubert

3.0k citations
78 papers · 2.4k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

F. Schubert

76 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

F. Schubert
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
  • Bioengineering 208
  • Developmental Neuroscience 112
  • Molecular Biology 1.7k
  • Electrochemistry 139
  • Developmental Biology 45
Replace Bin Lü with:
Bin Lü China
Marco Fichera Italy
Peter Heiduschka Germany
Yoheved Berwald‐Netter France
Gregory T. Baxter United States
Stephen M. Baylor United States
Andreas A. Werdich United States
Jeong Won Park South Korea
Philip E. Hockberger United States
Clive M. Baumgarten United States
F. Schubert relative to Bin Lü China Bin Lü's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Bin Lü · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Schubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Schubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Schubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Schubert. The network helps show where F. Schubert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Schubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Schubert Line = papers co-authored together F. Schubert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 78 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998184
2 1998181
3 2002176
4
c-fos expression induces bone tumors in transgenic mice.
1989151
5 1997140
6 1993106
7 1993101
8 200198
9 200392
10 198591
11 200282
12 199377
13 199161
14 200155
15 199554
16 200642
17 201241
18 200741
19 199140
20 199438

About F. Schubert

F. Schubert is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics and Bioengineering, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (23 papers), Congenital heart defects research (17 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (13 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (9 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (7 papers), Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling (6 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (6 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Bioengineering (208 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (112 citations), Molecular Biology (1.7k citations), Electrochemistry (139 citations) and Developmental Biology (45 citations). F. Schubert has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Dietrich, Andrew Lumsden, Susan C. Chapman, Frieder W. Scheller, Gary C. Schoenwolf, Peter Gruß, D. Komitowski, Ulrich Rüther, Erwin F. Wagner and D. Kirstein. Their work appears in journals such as Mechanisms of Development, Analytical Letters, Development, Developmental Biology and Developmental Dynamics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact