F. Saravia

62 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

F. Saravia
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Reproductive Medicine 1.4k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.2k
  • Physiology 197
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 367
  • Genetics 393
Replace C. E. Pope with:
C. E. Pope United States
J.R. Dobrinsky United States
Seán Fair Ireland
J.K. Graham United States
E. Gómez Spain
Patrick Blondin Canada
Raquel Romar Spain
Hernán Baldassarre Canada
Maria Dattena Italy
K. Niwa Japan
F. Saravia relative to C. E. Pope United States C. E. Pope's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
C. E. Pope · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Saravia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Saravia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Saravia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Saravia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Saravia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Saravia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Saravia. The network helps show where F. Saravia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Saravia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Saravia Line = papers co-authored together F. Saravia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004198
2 2005117
3
The physiological roles of the boar ejaculate.
200992
4 200585
5 200679
6 200778
7 200575
8 200870
9 200568
10 200665
11 200960
12 200455
13 200753
14 200850
15
Strategies to improve the fertility of frozen-thawed boar semen for artificial insemination.
200642
16 201736
17 200736
18 200636
19 201433
20 200932

About F. Saravia

F. Saravia is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine, Agronomy and Crop Science, Genetics and Physiology, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (43 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (36 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (22 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers), Reproductive biology and impacts on aquatic species (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (7 papers), Reproductive System and Pregnancy (6 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.4k citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.2k citations), Physiology (197 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (367 citations) and Genetics (393 citations). F. Saravia has collaborated with scholars based in Chile, Sweden and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Heriberto Rodríguez‐Martínez, Anders Johannisson, M. Wallgren, Fernando J. Peña, Margareta Wallgren, Jordi Roca, J.M. Vázquez, Emilio A. Martı́nez, Juan J. Calvete and Líbia Sanz. Their work appears in journals such as Theriogenology, International Journal of Andrology, Reproduction in Domestic Animals, Animal Reproduction Science and Animals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact