F. Pleiter

73 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

F. Pleiter
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Radiation 211
  • Condensed Matter Physics 241
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 178
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 408
  • Computational Mechanics 239
Replace Th. Wichert with:
Th. Wichert Germany
A. T. Stewart Canada
G.P. Pells United Kingdom
G. R. Piercy Canada
W. Witthuhn Germany
D. Schmaus France
J. L. Yarnell United States
R. Sielemann Germany
F. Bacon United States
T. S. Noggle United States
F. Pleiter relative to Th. Wichert Germany Th. Wichert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Th. Wichert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Pleiter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Pleiter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Pleiter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Pleiter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Pleiter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Pleiter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Pleiter. The network helps show where F. Pleiter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Pleiter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Pleiter Line = papers co-authored together F. Pleiter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1982142
2 1980106
3 197786
4 199362
5 199148
6 198039
7 197534
8 196828
9 197726
10 197725
11 198125
12 197424
13 199324
14 198422
15 198421
16 198219
17 197118
18 197917
19 199817
20 197317

About F. Pleiter

F. Pleiter is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Radiation, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics and Atmospheric Science, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fusion materials and technologies (15 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (14 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (12 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (12 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (8 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (8 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiation (211 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (241 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (178 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (408 citations) and Computational Mechanics (239 citations). F. Pleiter has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include C. Hohenemser, A. R. Arends, H. de Waard, D. P. van der Werf, H. G. Devare, H. H. Bertschat, E. Recknagel, B. Spellmeyer, L. Niesen and Lee Chow. Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A, Physics Letters A, Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Hyperfine Interactions and The European Physical Journal A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact