F. P. Lock
Impact in
- History top 5%
- European Political History Analysis
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics
- Political Theory and Influence
- Political Philosophy and Ethics
Papers in
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 11
- Political Theory and Influence 2
- Music 1
- Theater, Performance, and Music History 1
- Musicology and Musical Analysis 1
- Co-authors
- James J. Sack (1 shared paper)William B. Todd (1 shared paper)Peter D. Marshall (1 shared paper)David McCracken (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (2 papers)The English Historical Review (2 papers)The Modern Language Review (2 papers)Essays in Criticism (1 paper)Scottish historical review/The Scottish historical review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
F. P. Lock
12 papers receiving 90 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- History 58
- Political Science and International Relations 105
- Philosophy 42
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
- Literature and Literary Theory 15
Countries citing papers authored by F. P. Lock
This map shows the geographic impact of F. P. Lock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. P. Lock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. P. Lock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. P. Lock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. P. Lock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. P. Lock. The network helps show where F. P. Lock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside F. P. Lock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1986 | 69 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 4 | Swift's tory politics | 1983 | 11 |
| 5 | 1986 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2004 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1981 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1982 | 0 |
About F. P. Lock
F. P. Lock is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Music, Communication, Anthropology and History, having authored 17 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Political Theory and Influence (2 papers), European Political History Analysis (1 paper), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper), Authorship Attribution and Profiling (1 paper), Musicology and Musical Analysis (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Classical Antiquity Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (58 citations), Political Science and International Relations (105 citations), Philosophy (42 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (15 citations). F. P. Lock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include James J. Sack, William B. Todd, Peter D. Marshall and David McCracken. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The English Historical Review, The Modern Language Review, Essays in Criticism and Scottish historical review/The Scottish historical review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.