F. Otto

31 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

F. Otto
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Reproductive Medicine 59
  • Immunology and Allergy 28
  • Cancer Research 66
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
  • Developmental Neuroscience 17
Replace Jumpei Enami with:
Jumpei Enami Japan
Yuko Komiya United States
Sharon L. Wenger United States
Christoph Schorl United States
Dan Strumpf Canada
Houyan Song China
Hsi‐Yuan Yang Taiwan
Dominique Massey‐Harroche France
S.Y. Moon South Korea
Andreas Rump Germany
F. Otto relative to Jumpei Enami Japan Jumpei Enami's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Jumpei Enami · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Otto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Otto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Otto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Otto. The network helps show where F. Otto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Otto Line = papers co-authored together F. Otto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1981104
2 197949
3 200447
4 200345
5 200143
6 198543
7 199041
8 197027
9 200425
10 199820
11
Endotoxin (Salmonella abortus equi) in cancer patients. Clinical and immunological findings.
199520
12
Tumor characteristics involved in the metastatic behaviour as an improvement in primary cutaneous melanoma prognostics.
199820
13 198917
14 200917
15
A receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP zeta is expressed in human cutaneous melanomas.
200014
16 198014
17 200212
18
Interactions between endogeneous lectins and fucosylated oligosaccharides in megakaryocyte-dependent fibroblast growth of the normal bone marrow.
199611
19 19849
20 19936

About F. Otto

F. Otto is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Genetics, Plant Science and Cancer Research, having authored 36 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sperm and Testicular Function (7 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (3 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (3 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (3 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (3 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers) and Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (59 citations), Immunology and Allergy (28 citations), Cancer Research (66 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (79 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (17 citations). F. Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include H. Oldiges, W. Göhde, Varsha Jain, Mario Siebler, Wiebke Fleischer, D. Hochrainer, L. Suter, U. Glaser, Torsten Goldmann and Marvin L. Meistrich. Their work appears in journals such as Andrologia, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Annals of Hematology, Radiation and Environmental Biophysics and Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact