F. Namavar

3.4k citations
168 papers · 3.0k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

F. Namavar

166 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers

F. Namavar
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Materials Chemistry 1.9k
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 1.7k
  • Ceramics and Composites 148
  • Condensed Matter Physics 286
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 656
Replace J. C. Barbour with:
J. C. Barbour United States
M. Brunel France
J. Bevk United States
D. G. Ast United States
W. Jäger Germany
J. Stoëmenos Greece
Tatsuro Miyasato Japan
Kenta Arima Japan
Mizuho Morita Japan
R. Roy United States
F. Namavar relative to J. C. Barbour United States J. C. Barbour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
J. C. Barbour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Namavar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Namavar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Namavar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Namavar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Namavar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Namavar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Namavar. The network helps show where F. Namavar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Namavar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Namavar Line = papers co-authored together F. Namavar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 168 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992195
2 1994129
3 2010123
4 1992112
5 199782
6 200769
7 201162
8 199662
9 201462
10 200860
11 199559
12 199259
13 201257
14 201156
15 200455
16 199553
17 199353
18 200953
19 201451
20 199045

About F. Namavar

F. Namavar is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Biomedical Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 168 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor materials and devices (58 papers), Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence (47 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (35 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (26 papers), Nanowire Synthesis and Applications (24 papers), Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies (22 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (18 papers) and Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Materials Chemistry (1.9k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (1.7k citations), Ceramics and Composites (148 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (286 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (656 citations). F. Namavar has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Nader M. Kalkhoran, H. Paul Maruska, Graham T. Reed, William J. Weber, Yanwen Zhang, Philip D. Edmondson, Andrew Rickman, Richard Soref, J. I. Pánkové and John T. Torvik. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Applied Physics, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, Nanotechnology and Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact