F. M. Johnson
Impact in
- Genetics top 2%
- Genetic diversity and population structure
- Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Papers in
- Co-authors
- John S. Penta (3 shared papers)William C. Copeland (3 shared papers)J. T. Wachsman (3 shared papers)Susan E. Lewis (14 shared papers)Henry E. Schaffer (6 shared papers)L. Beckman (5 shared papers)Carter Denniston (1 shared paper)C. W. Stuber (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biochemical Genetics (11 papers)Genetics (10 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (7 papers)Nature (5 papers)Genetics Research (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
F. M. Johnson
77 papers receiving 3.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
- Genetics 1.1k
- Cancer Research 450
- Insect Science 407
- Aging 44
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
Countries citing papers authored by F. M. Johnson
This map shows the geographic impact of F. M. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. M. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. M. Johnson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. M. Johnson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. M. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. M. Johnson. The network helps show where F. M. Johnson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. M. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 389 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 352 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 227 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 198 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 182 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 118 | |
| 7 | 1981 | 111 | |
| 8 | 1964 | 94 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 85 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 84 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 81 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 80 | |
| 13 | 1978 | 78 | |
| 14 | 1966 | 74 | |
| 15 | 1964 | 74 | |
| 16 | 1980 | 64 | |
| 17 | 1969 | 61 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 55 | |
| 19 | 1967 | 52 | |
| 20 | 1974 | 46 |
About F. M. Johnson
F. M. Johnson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Insect Science, Genetics and Cancer Research, having authored 79 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (13 papers), Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (7 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (7 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers), Plant and animal studies (5 papers) and Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (1.1k citations), Cancer Research (450 citations), Insect Science (407 citations), Aging (44 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.6k citations). F. M. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include John S. Penta, William C. Copeland, J. T. Wachsman, Susan E. Lewis, Henry E. Schaffer, L. Beckman, Carter Denniston, C. W. Stuber, M. M. Goodman and John M. Burns. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemical Genetics, Genetics, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature and Genetics Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.