Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems2012 · 1.7k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
2012Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lord more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lord. The network helps show where F. Lord may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
2 of 2 papers shown
#
Work
1
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
F. Lord is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 2 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Student Assessment and Feedback (1 paper) and Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (760 citations), Statistics and Probability (310 citations), Computer Science Applications (120 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (402 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.