Steffi Pohl

56 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Steffi Pohl
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Statistics and Probability 310
  • Management Science and Operations Research 439
  • Applied Psychology 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 232
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 152
Replace Marie Wiberg with:
Marie Wiberg Sweden
Claus H. Carstensen Germany
F. Lord
Michael L. Nering United States
Vicente Ponsoda Spain
Jorge N. Tendeiro Netherlands
Sun‐Joo Cho United States
DE Ayala United States
Insu Paek United States
Barbara G. Dodd United States
Steffi Pohl relative to Marie Wiberg Sweden Marie Wiberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Marie Wiberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steffi Pohl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffi Pohl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffi Pohl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffi Pohl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffi Pohl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffi Pohl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffi Pohl. The network helps show where Steffi Pohl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steffi Pohl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steffi Pohl Line = papers co-authored together Steffi Pohl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201394
2 201978
3 201067
4 200967
5 200766
6 202152
7 201351
8 200947
9 201944
10 201242
11 201932
12 202132
13 200932
14 201431
15 202129
16 201723
17 201923
18 202121
19 201318
20 201118

About Steffi Pohl

Steffi Pohl is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (26 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (16 papers), Advanced Causal Inference Techniques (15 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (5 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (310 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (439 citations), Applied Psychology (84 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (232 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (152 citations). Steffi Pohl has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Esther Ulitzsch, Matthias von Davier, Claus H. Carstensen, Rolf Steyer, Peter M. Steiner, Norman Rose, Thomas D. Cook, Carmen Köhler, Tenko Raykov and Stéphane Vautier. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Psychometrika, Multivariate Behavioral Research, Journal of Educational Measurement and British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact