F. Lasbennes

727 citations
16 papers · 624 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

F. Lasbennes

16 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers

F. Lasbennes
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 278
  • Neurology 120
  • Physiology 57
  • Developmental Neuroscience 49
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 42
Replace R. H. A. Kemper with:
R. H. A. Kemper Netherlands
D. Song United States
J Gayet France
Hameed Al‐Sarraf Kuwait
Donald E. Palm United States
Knut H. Lauritzen Norway
B. J. Mršulja United States
Ljubisav Rakić Serbia
P.J. Gebicke-Haerter Germany
Shiyong Liu China
F. Lasbennes relative to R. H. A. Kemper Netherlands R. H. A. Kemper's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
R. H. A. Kemper · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Lasbennes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Lasbennes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Lasbennes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Lasbennes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Lasbennes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Lasbennes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Lasbennes. The network helps show where F. Lasbennes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Lasbennes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Lasbennes Line = papers co-authored together F. Lasbennes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 1993207
2 200258
3 200056
4 199353
5 199452
6 198343
7 199536
8 198436
9 198618
10 198812
11 198612
12 198411
13 198611
14 19858
15 20026
16 19925

About F. Lasbennes

F. Lasbennes is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Physiology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 624 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (3 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (278 citations), Neurology (120 citations), Physiology (57 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (49 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (42 citations). F. Lasbennes has collaborated with scholars based in France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Seylaz, Anne Héron, H. Pollard, Frédéric Dessi, Christiane Charriaut‐Marlangue, Yehezkel Ben‐Ari, R. Sercombe, J Gayet, Jérôme Badaut and Astrid Nehlig. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Experimental Brain Research, Journal of Neurochemistry, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism and Life Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact