F. H. Soward

1.2k citations
44 papers · 262 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

F. H. Soward

35 papers receiving 193 citations

Peers

F. H. Soward
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Political Science and International Relations 169
  • Development 21
  • Sociology and Political Science 142
  • History 32
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 2
Replace J. Leo Cefkin with:
J. Leo Cefkin United States
Elizabeth Kridl Valkenier United States
Philip W. Buck United States
F. S. Northedge United Kingdom
William G. Hyland United States
Kenneth E. Shewmaker United States
J. Lloyd Mecham United States
Otto Hintze
George McT. Kahin United States
Ronald Robinson
F. H. Soward relative to J. Leo Cefkin United States J. Leo Cefkin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. Leo Cefkin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. H. Soward

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. H. Soward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. H. Soward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. H. Soward more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. H. Soward

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. H. Soward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. H. Soward. The network helps show where F. H. Soward may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside F. H. Soward, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. H. Soward Line = papers co-authored together F. H. Soward links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197448
2 195925
3 196224
4 195721
5 197419
6 196317
7 196215
8 197111
9 19628
10 19637
11 19517
12 19606
13
Canada and the United Nations
19565
14 19714
15 19624
16 19704
17 19644
18 19643
19 19652
20 19512

About F. H. Soward

F. H. Soward is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, History, History and Philosophy of Science and Cultural Studies, having authored 44 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Canadian Identity and History (4 papers), Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (4 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (4 papers), Canadian Policy and Governance (4 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (2 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (169 citations), Development (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (142 citations), History (32 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (2 citations). F. H. Soward has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brian Porter, F. H. Hinsley, Tang Tsou, W. Friedmann, C. Cecil Lingard, Arnold J. Toynbee, George F. Kennan and J. Bartlet Brebner. Their work appears in journals such as Pacific Affairs, International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis, The Political Quarterly, The Journal of Modern History and International Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact