F. G. Eich

715 citations
23 papers · 507 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

F. G. Eich

23 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

F. G. Eich
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 421
  • Condensed Matter Physics 126
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 91
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 43
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 29
Replace Ryan Requist with:
Ryan Requist Germany
Helen van Aggelen Belgium
Mukunda P. Das Australia
Ward Poelmans Belgium
Jordan J. Phillips United States
Maria Hellgren France
Soumya Mukherjee India
S. K. Lai Taiwan
Aleksei V. Ivanov Russia
F. G. Eich relative to Ryan Requist Germany Ryan Requist's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Ryan Requist · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. G. Eich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. G. Eich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. G. Eich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. G. Eich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. G. Eich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. G. Eich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. G. Eich. The network helps show where F. G. Eich may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. G. Eich, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. G. Eich Line = papers co-authored together F. G. Eich links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200983
2 201349
3 201643
4 201834
5 201033
6 201733
7 201333
8 201432
9 202025
10 202120
11 202220
12 201420
13 201617
14 202113
15 201711
16 20109
17 20178
18 20187
19 20097
20 20186

About F. G. Eich

F. G. Eich is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Materials Chemistry and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (10 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (10 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (8 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (3 papers), Thermal properties of materials (3 papers) and Advanced Thermoelectric Materials and Devices (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (421 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (126 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (91 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (43 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (29 citations). F. G. Eich has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Giovanni Vignale, E. K. U. Gross, Federica Agostini, Stefano Pittalis, Ángel Rubio, Massimiliano Di Ventra, Nektarios N. Lathiotakis, Miguel A. L. Marques, Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean and S. Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., Physical Review B, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical Review Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact