F. Fourrier

58 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

F. Fourrier
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 287
  • Internal Medicine 103
  • Hematology 191
  • Epidemiology 377
  • Neurology 166
Replace François Fourrier with:
François Fourrier France
Martin Albert Canada
Vicente Corrales‐Medina Canada
Ioannis Pneumatikos Greece
Bruno Lévy France
Miklós Lipcsey Sweden
Brigitte Stoiser Austria
N. Soni United Kingdom
Amélie Seguin France
Pierre-François Laterre Belgium
F. Fourrier relative to François Fourrier France François Fourrier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
François Fourrier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Fourrier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Fourrier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Fourrier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Fourrier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Fourrier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Fourrier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Fourrier. The network helps show where F. Fourrier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Fourrier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Fourrier Line = papers co-authored together F. Fourrier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998250
2 2000214
3 2003132
4 1990100
5 200179
6
Sex steroid hormones in circulatory shock, sepsis syndrome, and septic shock.
199474
7 198549
8 200446
9 199540
10 198328
11
[Prospective, randomized, controlled study of imipenem-cilastatin versus cefotaxime-amikacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and septicemia at intensive care units].
199025
12 201019
13 198817
14 200617
15 200615
16 201215
17 201213
18 200412
19 198912
20 201611

About F. Fourrier

F. Fourrier is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Surgery, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (12 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (8 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (7 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (3 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers) and Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (287 citations), Internal Medicine (103 citations), Hematology (191 citations), Epidemiology (377 citations) and Neurology (166 citations). F. Fourrier has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include C Chopin, M. Jourdain, Hervé Boutigny, M. Roussel‐Delvallez, Jacques Mangalaboyi, H.-P. Schuster, Maurice Lamy, U. Delvos, Bernd Eisele and L. G. Thijs. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, Shock, Vox Sanguinis and Clinical and Experimental Dermatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact