F. Ε. Adcock
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Archeology top 10%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
- Historical and Architectural Studies
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History
Papers in
-
- Classical Antiquity Studies 7
-
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 3
- Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies 1
- Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History 1
- Co-authors
- John V. A. Fine (1 shared paper)Carl Roebuck (1 shared paper)D. J. Mosley (1 shared paper)Stewart Irvin Oost (1 shared paper)A.E. Raubitschek (1 shared paper)Luitpold Wallach (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Roman Studies (2 papers)The Classical World (2 papers)The Journal of Hellenic Studies (1 paper)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)The American Historical Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
F. Ε. Adcock
10 papers receiving 63 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Anthropology 73
- Archeology 32
- Classics 11
- History 12
- Philosophy 10
Countries citing papers authored by F. Ε. Adcock
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ε. Adcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ε. Adcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ε. Adcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ε. Adcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ε. Adcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ε. Adcock. The network helps show where F. Ε. Adcock may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside F. Ε. Adcock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1976 | 29 | |
| 2 | 1958 | 28 | |
| 3 | 1964 | 16 | |
| 4 | 1959 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1964 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1957 | 8 | |
| 7 | 1957 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1951 | 2 | |
| 10 | Caesar als Schriftsteller | 1957 | 1 |
| 11 | 1951 | 1 | |
| 12 | Caesar As Man of Letters | 2011 | 1 |
About F. Ε. Adcock
F. Ε. Adcock is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Classics, History and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 117 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Classical Studies and Legal History (2 papers), Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies (1 paper), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (1 paper) and Law, logistics, and international trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (73 citations), Archeology (32 citations), Classics (11 citations), History (12 citations) and Philosophy (10 citations). F. Ε. Adcock has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John V. A. Fine, Carl Roebuck, D. J. Mosley, Stewart Irvin Oost, A.E. Raubitschek and Luitpold Wallach. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Roman Studies, The Classical World, The Journal of Hellenic Studies, The American Journal of Philology and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.