F. Cervero

1.2k citations
23 papers · 948 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

F. Cervero

21 papers receiving 900 citations

Peers

F. Cervero
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Physiology 711
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 411
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 69
  • Pharmacology 151
  • Sensory Systems 43
Replace Stuart D. Anderson with:
Stuart D. Anderson United States
Donald N. Franz United States
J. G. Thalhammer United States
H. L. Fields United States
Jean Marie Besson France
David V. Reynolds Canada
Greg Zorman United States
K. D. Gerhart United States
V. Palečková United States
C.R. Morton Australia
F. Cervero relative to Stuart D. Anderson United States Stuart D. Anderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stuart D. Anderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Cervero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Cervero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Cervero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Cervero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Cervero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Cervero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Cervero. The network helps show where F. Cervero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside F. Cervero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Cervero Line = papers co-authored together F. Cervero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989170
2 1991144
3 198393
4 198582
5 198481
6 198163
7 198451
8 197948
9 198647
10 198441
11 198238
12 198227
13 198126
14 197916
15 19826
16 19796
17
Activity from single neurones recorded in the substantia gelatinosa Rolandi of the cat [proceedings].
19774
18
Effects of noxious stimulation of the skin on transmission through the spinocervical tract [proceedings].
19761
19 19861
20 19851

About F. Cervero

F. Cervero is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Neurology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (11 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (2 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers) and Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (711 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (411 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (69 citations), Pharmacology (151 citations) and Sensory Systems (43 citations). F. Cervero has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G.J. Bennett, P.M. Headley, J. H. Wolstencroft, Hans‐Georg Schaible, Robert F. Schmidt, Volker Neugebauer, A. Iggo, V. Molony, John E.H. Tattersall and Bridget M. Lumb. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Brain Research, Journal of Neurophysiology, The Journal of Physiology and British Journal of Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact