F. Árias

1.7k citations
87 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

F. Árias

80 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

F. Árias
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Pharmacology 249
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 190
  • Urology 76
  • Otorhinolaryngology 43
  • Clinical Psychology 185
Replace Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran with:
Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran Türkiye
Apurva Prakash United States
Daniel N. Masica United States
Jacques Devulder Belgium
Deborah Quail United Kingdom
Julia K. Warnock United States
Walter Deberdt United States
Michael Sweeney United States
Dana DiBenedetti United States
M. Bridget Zimmerman United States
F. Árias relative to Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran Türkiye Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×21.5×
Eylem Şahin Cankurtaran · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Árias

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Árias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Árias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Árias more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Árias

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Árias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Árias. The network helps show where F. Árias may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Árias, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Árias Line = papers co-authored together F. Árias links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995138
2 2002107
3 2007104
4 2002104
5 202095
6 200284
7 201337
8 201635
9 201235
10 201235
11 200233
12 200532
13
Abuse or dependence on cannabis and other psychiatric disorders. Madrid study on dual pathology prevalence.
201426
14 202025
15 201223
16 201722
17
[Clinical differences between morbid obese patients with and without binge eating].
200721
18 200819
19 201117
20 201617

About F. Árias

F. Árias is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Oncology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (11 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (7 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (5 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (5 papers), Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects (5 papers) and Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (249 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (190 citations), Urology (76 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (43 citations) and Clinical Psychology (185 citations). F. Árias has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ignacio Basurte-Villamor, Pablo Vega, Beatriz Mesías, Antoni Gual, Consuelo Morant, Rubén A. Quintero, Mark I. Evans, Roberto Romero, Mark P. Johnson and Joan Trujols. Their work appears in journals such as Adicciones, Clinical & Translational Oncology, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Alcohol and Alcoholism and Colorectal Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact