Ewan Gray

857 citations
29 papers · 528 · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Behavioral Health and Interventions
    • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
    • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Papers in

Ewan Gray

29 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers

Ewan Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Applied Psychology 45
  • Oncology 131
  • Cancer Research 51
  • Economics and Econometrics 81
  • Health Informatics 4
Replace Gordon J. Mcvie with:
Gordon J. Mcvie Italy
Judy Truong Canada
Tatiane Yanes Australia
Elvan C. Daniels United States
Maria Fjell Sweden
Margaret M. Farrell United States
Seerat Anand United States
Suzanne M. O’Neill United States
Gila Neta United States
Anirudh Gothwal United States
Ewan Gray relative to Gordon J. Mcvie Italy Gordon J. Mcvie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Gordon J. Mcvie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ewan Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ewan Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewan Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewan Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ewan Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewan Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewan Gray. The network helps show where Ewan Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ewan Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ewan Gray Line = papers co-authored together Ewan Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202185
2 202055
3 201653
4 201751
5 201847
6 201536
7 202034
8 202125
9 201017
10 201816
11 201513
12 201913
13 202012
14
Clinical algorithms for cancer chemotherapy--systems for community-based consultant-extenders and oncology centers.
19768
15 20248
16 20227
17 20217
18 20196
19 20166
20 20196

About Ewan Gray

Ewan Gray is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Hepatology, Oncology, Statistics and Probability and General Decision Sciences, having authored 29 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (3 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (3 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (1 paper) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (45 citations), Oncology (131 citations), Cancer Research (51 citations), Economics and Econometrics (81 citations) and Health Informatics (4 citations). Ewan Gray has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Katherine A. Payne, Peter S Hall, Matthew Sutton, Eleonora Fichera, Caroline Mary Vass, Joachim Marti, Jeremy C Wyatt, Gabrielle C. Baxter, Simon J. Bond and Jonine D. Figueroa. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, BMJ Open, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and PLoS Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact