Ewa Stępień

152 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Peers

Ewa Stępień
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Internal Medicine 121
  • Cancer Research 482
  • Radiation 191
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 408
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 566
Replace Manfred P. Wirth with:
Manfred P. Wirth Germany
Irene Virgolini Austria
Rainer M. Bohle Germany
Hideya Yamazaki Japan
Lorenzo Spaggiari Italy
Stanley J. Goldsmith United States
Hideaki Shimada Japan
Eric T. Choi United States
Takahiro Nakajima Japan
Byung‐Tae Kim South Korea
Ewa Stępień relative to Manfred P. Wirth Germany Manfred P. Wirth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Manfred P. Wirth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ewa Stępień

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ewa Stępień's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewa Stępień with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewa Stępień more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ewa Stępień

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewa Stępień. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewa Stępień. The network helps show where Ewa Stępień may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ewa Stępień, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ewa Stępień Line = papers co-authored together Ewa Stępień links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 162 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007164
2 2008161
3 2011122
4 2009113
5 2019112
6 201288
7 201888
8 202082
9 200980
10 201868
11 200665
12 201659
13
Extracellular vesicles participate in the transport of cytokines and angiogenic factors in diabetic patients with ocular complications.
201556
14 202349
15 200847
16 201247
17 201947
18 201546
19 201644
20 201942

About Ewa Stępień

Ewa Stępień is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 162 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Extracellular vesicles in disease (34 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Muon and positron interactions and applications (11 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (10 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (9 papers), Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (8 papers), Boron Compounds in Chemistry (6 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (121 citations), Cancer Research (482 citations), Radiation (191 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (408 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (566 citations). Ewa Stępień has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include P. Moskal, Krzysztof Żmudka, Wiesława Tracz, Anetta Undas, Małgorzata Przybyło, Francisco J. Enguita, Anna Drożdż, Magdalena Surman, Anetta Undas and Agnieszka Kamińska. Their work appears in journals such as EJNMMI Physics, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Archives of Medical Research, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis and Atherosclerosis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact