Eva Stodůlková
Impact in
- Toxicology top 10%
-
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 5
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 3
- Co-authors
- Miroslav Flieger (22 shared papers)Miroslav Kolařík (13 shared papers)Helena Lipavská (2 shared papers)Alžběta Rejšková (1 shared paper)Petr Novák (12 shared papers)Milada Chudíčková (6 shared papers)Jan Černý (8 shared papers)Petr Man (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (3 papers)Immunology Letters (3 papers)Fungal Biology (2 papers)Current Eye Research (2 papers)Toxins (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited StatesBelarus
In The Last Decade
Eva Stodůlková
30 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Toxicology 21
- Pharmacology 80
- Plant Science 192
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 95
- Cell Biology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Stodůlková
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Stodůlková's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Stodůlková with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Stodůlková more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Stodůlková
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Stodůlková. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Stodůlková. The network helps show where Eva Stodůlková may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Stodůlková, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 82 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 5 | Single-stranded oligonucleotide-mediated in vivo gene repair in the rd1 retina. | 2007 | 27 |
| 6 | 2002 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 20 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2001 | 7 |
About Eva Stodůlková
Eva Stodůlková is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pharmacology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Toxicology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 488 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and fungal interactions (5 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (5 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (5 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (5 papers), Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents (4 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (21 citations), Pharmacology (80 citations), Plant Science (192 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (95 citations) and Cell Biology (63 citations). Eva Stodůlková has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United States and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Miroslav Flieger, Miroslav Kolařík, Helena Lipavská, Alžběta Rejšková, Petr Novák, Milada Chudíčková, Jan Černý, Petr Man, Marek Kuzma and Sylvie Pažoutová. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Immunology Letters, Fungal Biology, Current Eye Research and Toxins.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.