Eva Nittinger

1.5k citations
28 papers · 901 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Nittinger

26 papers receiving 886 citations

Peers

Eva Nittinger
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 428
  • Molecular Biology 543
  • Materials Chemistry 263
  • Pharmacology 38
  • Pharmacology 65
Replace Florian Flachsenberg with:
Florian Flachsenberg Germany
Agnes Meyder Germany
Eloy Félix United Kingdom
John W. Mayfield United States
Mark Mackey United Kingdom
Wen Torng United States
Woong‐Hee Shin South Korea
Stefan Bietz Germany
Masakazu Sekijima Japan
Delaram Ghoreishi United States
Eva Nittinger relative to Florian Flachsenberg Germany Florian Flachsenberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Florian Flachsenberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Nittinger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Nittinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Nittinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Nittinger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Nittinger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Nittinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Nittinger. The network helps show where Eva Nittinger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Nittinger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Nittinger Line = papers co-authored together Eva Nittinger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020194
2 2017182
3 201768
4 202163
5 201759
6 201543
7 202241
8 202139
9 201835
10 201929
11 202126
12 202320
13 202214
14 202111
15 20249
16 20249
17 20169
18 20248
19 20238
20 20247

About Eva Nittinger

Eva Nittinger is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation, having authored 28 papers that have together received 901 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (13 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (13 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (8 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (3 papers), Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers) and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (428 citations), Molecular Biology (543 citations), Materials Chemistry (263 citations), Pharmacology (38 citations) and Pharmacology (65 citations). Eva Nittinger has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Germany and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Rarey, Agnes Meyder, Florian Flachsenberg, Stefan Bietz, Gudrun Lange, Christian Tyrchan, Andrea Volkamer, Robert J. Klein, Katrin Stierand and Konrad Diedrich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cheminformatics, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, ACS Omega, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design and Nucleic Acids Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact