Eva Lærkner

19 papers receiving 377 citations

Peers

Eva Lærkner
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 224
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 220
  • Research and Theory 7
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 43
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 7
Replace S. McKinley with:
S. McKinley Australia
Agness Tembo Australia
Breanna Hetland United States
Ingrid Wåhlin Sweden
Cynthia M. LaFond United States
Maria Henricson Sweden
Lance Patak United States
Ingegerd Bergbom-Engberg Sweden
Jennifer B. Seaman United States
Ingegerd Bergbom Engberg Sweden
Eva Lærkner relative to S. McKinley Australia S. McKinley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
S. McKinley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Lærkner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Lærkner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Lærkner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Lærkner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Lærkner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Lærkner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Lærkner. The network helps show where Eva Lærkner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Lærkner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Lærkner Line = papers co-authored together Eva Lærkner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201584
2 200776
3 201075
4 201741
5 201924
6 202120
7 201518
8 201616
9 20238
10 20167
11 20215
12 20224
13 20234
14 20234
15 20233
16 20231
17 20231
18 20251
19 20161
20 20210

About Eva Lærkner

Eva Lærkner is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Clinical Psychology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (15 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (13 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (7 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (4 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (1 paper), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (224 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (220 citations), Research and Theory (7 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (43 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (7 citations). Eva Lærkner has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Norway and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ingrid Egerod, Helle Ploug Hansen, Regner Birkelund, Finn Olesen, Palle Toft, Mette Juel Rothmann, Eva Jespersen, Hanne Tanghus Olsen, Pia Dreyer and Maj‐Brit Nørregaard Kjær. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Nursing in Critical Care, International Journal of Nursing Studies and Australian Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact