Éva Fodor

1.5k citations
39 papers · 874 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Éva Fodor

39 papers receiving 707 citations

Peers

Éva Fodor
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Gender Studies 377
  • Political Science and International Relations 386
  • Public Administration 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 441
  • Demography 90
Replace Steven Saxonberg with:
Steven Saxonberg Czechia
V. Spike Peterson United States
Jocelyn Viterna United States
Sara R. Farris United Kingdom
Ellen Reese United States
Sonya Michel United States
Diemut Bubeck Mexico
Rutvica Andrijasevic United Kingdom
Dorothy McBride Stetson United States
Yasmeen Abu‐Laban Canada
Éva Fodor relative to Steven Saxonberg Czechia Steven Saxonberg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Steven Saxonberg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Éva Fodor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Éva Fodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éva Fodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éva Fodor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Éva Fodor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éva Fodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éva Fodor. The network helps show where Éva Fodor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Éva Fodor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Éva Fodor Line = papers co-authored together Éva Fodor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 39 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202090
2 200283
3 200761
4 202159
5 201149
6 199842
7 199739
8 199639
9 200536
10 199632
11 201029
12 200226
13 200226
14
The Racialization and Feminization of Poverty
200124
15 201423
16 201720
17 200320
18 200319
19 201816
20 201716

About Éva Fodor

Éva Fodor is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, General Health Professions and Public Administration, having authored 39 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (19 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (8 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (6 papers), European history and politics (5 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (4 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (4 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (377 citations), Political Science and International Relations (386 citations), Public Administration (42 citations), Sociology and Political Science (441 citations) and Demography (90 citations). Éva Fodor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Christy Glass, Júlia Koltai, Eszter Kováts, Tanja van der Lippe, Iván Szelényi, Matthew McKeever, Donald J. Treiman, Beáta Nagy, Eric Hanley and Rebecca Jean Emigh. Their work appears in journals such as Gender & Society, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Social Forces, Social Politics International Studies in Gender State & Society and Communist and Post-Communist Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact