Eva Deemer

18 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Eva Deemer
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Water Science and Technology 234
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 115
  • Materials Chemistry 260
  • Biomedical Engineering 224
  • Inorganic Chemistry 66
Replace Basem E. Keshta with:
Basem E. Keshta Egypt
Golnoush Zamiri Malaysia
Seleim M. Seleim Egypt
Chenglong Dong China
Prashant Kumar Mishra India
Hasan F. Alesary Iraq
Humaira Seema Pakistan
Xiaona Luo China
Tingting Zhao China
A. V. Melezhik Russia
Eva Deemer relative to Basem E. Keshta Egypt Basem E. Keshta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×37.5×
Basem E. Keshta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Deemer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Deemer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Deemer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Deemer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Deemer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Deemer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Deemer. The network helps show where Eva Deemer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Deemer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Deemer Line = papers co-authored together Eva Deemer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2021197
2 2019101
3 201998
4 201746
5 202041
6 202033
7 201817
8 202417
9 202315
10 202014
11 201914
12 201512
13 202210
14 20196
15 20186
16 20242
17 20241
18 20231

About Eva Deemer

Eva Deemer is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Water Science and Technology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 18 papers that have together received 631 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Membrane Separation Technologies (5 papers), Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques (4 papers), Graphene research and applications (3 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (2 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (2 papers), Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (2 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (2 papers) and Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Water Science and Technology (234 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (115 citations), Materials Chemistry (260 citations), Biomedical Engineering (224 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (66 citations). Eva Deemer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Juan C. Noveron, Ahmed A. El‐Gendy, Michael L. Curry, Huiyao Wang, Md Ariful Ahsan, Olivia Fernandez‐Delgado, W. Shane Walker, Anil Krishna Battu, C.V. Ramana and Qiyi Fang. Their work appears in journals such as Materials, Materials Today, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research and Dental Materials Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact