Éva Borbély
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Ion Channels and Receptors
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology 17
- Physiology 14
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 13
- Co-authors
- Zsuzsanna Helyes (37 shared papers)Bálint Scheich (8 shared papers)Erika Pintér (20 shared papers)Janós Szolcsányi (13 shared papers)Valéria Tékus (12 shared papers)Ágnes Kemény (8 shared papers)Bálint Botz (8 shared papers)Zsófia Hajna (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Pharmacology (4 papers)Scientific Reports (3 papers)Neuropeptides (3 papers)European Journal of Pain (2 papers)GeroScience (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Éva Borbély
38 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Sensory Systems 165
- Biological Psychiatry 63
- Behavioral Neuroscience 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 336
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 64
Countries citing papers authored by Éva Borbély
This map shows the geographic impact of Éva Borbély's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Éva Borbély with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Éva Borbély more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Éva Borbély
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Éva Borbély. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Éva Borbély. The network helps show where Éva Borbély may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Éva Borbély, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 127 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 80 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 80 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 78 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 51 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 37 | |
| 10 | Lyocell, The New Generation of Regenerated Cellulose | 2008 | 37 |
| 11 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 29 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 28 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 20 | 2019 | 21 |
About Éva Borbély
Éva Borbély is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Sensory Systems and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (17 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (10 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (10 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (3 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (165 citations), Biological Psychiatry (63 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (336 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (64 citations). Éva Borbély has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Zsuzsanna Helyes, Bálint Scheich, Erika Pintér, Janós Szolcsányi, Valéria Tékus, Ágnes Kemény, Bálint Botz, Zsófia Hajna, Ádám Horváth and Agnes I. Hunyady. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Pharmacology, Scientific Reports, Neuropeptides, European Journal of Pain and GeroScience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.