Eva Baxter

608 citations
14 papers · 360 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Baxter

11 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers

Eva Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 110
  • Reproductive Medicine 54
  • Cancer Research 42
  • Molecular Biology 154
  • Oncology 41
Replace J. Hunn with:
J. Hunn United States
Yuanxi Zhu China
Chengcheng Ning China
Josef Chovanec Czechia
Shoko Ueda Japan
Irene Aguilera‐Barrantes United States
Laura Hautala Finland
Xiulong Niu China
Huafeng Shou China
Zhongping Cheng China
Eva Baxter relative to J. Hunn United States J. Hunn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.4×
J. Hunn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Baxter. The network helps show where Eva Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Baxter Line = papers co-authored together Eva Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2014120
2 202066
3 202060
4 202030
5 202125
6 202023
7 201621
8 201811
9 20252
10
Surgical safety and personal costs in morbidly obese, multimorbid patients diagnosed with early-stage endometrial cancer having a hysterectomy
20161
11 20251
12 20260
13 20250
14 20260

About Eva Baxter

Eva Baxter is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Reproductive Medicine, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (2 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (1 paper), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (1 paper), FOXO transcription factor regulation (1 paper), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (1 paper) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (110 citations), Reproductive Medicine (54 citations), Cancer Research (42 citations), Molecular Biology (154 citations) and Oncology (41 citations). Eva Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Frank Gannon, Jason S. Lee, Karolina Windloch, Donal J. Brennan, Michael Wilkinson, Andreas Obermair, Monika Janda, Robert L. Coleman, Jessica N. McAlpine and Melinda S. Yates. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, Endocrine Related Cancer, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Cell & Bioscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact