Eva Barrett

29 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Eva Barrett's Hit Papers

γ-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine 2012 · 905 citations
9050+4+9Years since publication250500750

Peers

Eva Barrett
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Biological Psychiatry 279
  • Gastroenterology 178
  • Pharmacy 64
  • Physiology 354
  • Food Science 215
Replace Andrew M. Stanisz with:
Andrew M. Stanisz Canada
Ángela Moya-Pérez Spain
Annunziata Scirocco Italy
Alyce M. Martin Australia
Amy Loughman Australia
Filip Scheperjans Finland
Kazufumi Yoshihara Japan
Igor Łoniewski Poland
Vadim Osadchiy United States
Alexander Viardot Australia
Eva Barrett relative to Andrew M. Stanisz Canada Andrew M. Stanisz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Andrew M. Stanisz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Barrett. The network helps show where Eva Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Barrett, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Barrett Line = papers co-authored together Eva Barrett links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
γ-Aminobutyric acid production by culturable bacteria from the human intestine
Hit paper breakdown →
2012905
2 2013132
3 2018101
4 200780
5 201177
6 201660
7 201348
8 202043
9 201728
10 200726
11 201925
12 200923
13 201819
14 201919
15 197214
16 202113
17 202012
18 202012
19 201810
20 20187

About Eva Barrett

Eva Barrett is a scholar working on Surgery, Food Science, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shoulder Injury and Treatment (5 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), AI in Service Interactions (3 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (3 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (3 papers), Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment (3 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (279 citations), Gastroenterology (178 citations), Pharmacy (64 citations), Physiology (354 citations) and Food Science (215 citations). Eva Barrett has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include R. Paul Ross, Catherine Stanton, Gerald F. Fitzgerald, Paul W. O’Toole, Karen McCreesh, Jeremy Lewis, Dympna Casey, Sally Whelan, Kathy Murphy and Adam Santorelli. Their work appears in journals such as Age and Ageing, International Journal of Social Robotics, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The Journal of World Energy Law & Business and Journal of Hand Therapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact