Eva Åkerman

28 papers receiving 398 citations

Peers

Eva Åkerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 231
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 208
  • Emergency Medicine 96
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Clinical Psychology 90
Replace Hege Selnes Haugdahl with:
Hege Selnes Haugdahl Norway
Eva Lærkner Denmark
Wendy M. Fallis Canada
Kate Bray United Kingdom
Kalliopi Kydonaki United Kingdom
Kirsti Tøien Norway
Catherine Plowright United Kingdom
Carol Kelley United States
Sarah Ingleby United Kingdom
Beverley Ewens Australia
Eva Åkerman relative to Hege Selnes Haugdahl Norway Hege Selnes Haugdahl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Hege Selnes Haugdahl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Åkerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Åkerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Åkerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Åkerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Åkerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Åkerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Åkerman. The network helps show where Eva Åkerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eva Åkerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Åkerman Line = papers co-authored together Eva Åkerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201163
2 201059
3 201251
4 201840
5 201737
6 201233
7 202122
8 201813
9
Assessment and tools for follow up of patients' recovery after intensive care
201213
10 200812
11 202111
12 201311
13 20199
14 20228
15 20217
16 20187
17 20125
18 20244
19 20244
20 20203

About Eva Åkerman

Eva Åkerman is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (14 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (3 papers) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (231 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (208 citations), Emergency Medicine (96 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations) and Clinical Psychology (90 citations). Eva Åkerman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Anders Ersson, Bengt Fridlund, Ingrid Egerod, Sissel Lisa Storli, Ingegerd Bergbom, Johan Undén, Karin Samuelson, Isabell Fridh, Tobias Cronberg and Gisela Lilja. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, Nursing in Critical Care, Resuscitation, BMC Public Health and Critical Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact