Eugene Ford

2.7k citations
29 papers · 2.4k · h-index 20

Impact in

  • Pharmacology top 0.5%
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
    • Fungal Biology and Applications
    • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Papers in

    • Fungal Biology and Applications 11
    • Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 9
    • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 16

Eugene Ford

29 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Eugene Ford
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Pharmacology 1.4k
  • Cell Biology 683
  • Biotechnology 256
  • Plant Science 766
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 336
Replace John Frederick Grove with:
John Frederick Grove United Kingdom
Uvidelio Castillo United States
Syed Riyaz‐Ul‐Hassan India
H.-J. Aust Germany
Anthony L. J. Cole New Zealand
W. B. Turner United Kingdom
W. X. Zou China
V. Betina Slovakia
P. S. STEYN South Africa
Surendra K. Gond India
Eugene Ford relative to John Frederick Grove United Kingdom John Frederick Grove's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
John Frederick Grove · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eugene Ford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene Ford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene Ford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene Ford. The network helps show where Eugene Ford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eugene Ford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eugene Ford Line = papers co-authored together Eugene Ford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002341
2 2002309
3 2003283
4 1996217
5 1996217
6 2003214
7 1998165
8 1998132
9 200073
10 197265
11 199554
12 199940
13 198925
14 199925
15 199024
16 198924
17 199723
18 197420
19 200320
20 197020

About Eugene Ford

Eugene Ford is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Cell Biology, Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Oncology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (16 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (11 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (9 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (6 papers), Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (5 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (3 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (2 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (1.4k citations), Cell Biology (683 citations), Biotechnology (256 citations), Plant Science (766 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (336 citations). Eugene Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gary A. Strobel, W. M. Hess, James K. Harper, Atta M. Arif, David M. Grant, Rajinder S. Sidhu, Xiao‐Long Yang, R. Sidhu, James B. Jensen and David B. Teplow. Their work appears in journals such as Microbiology, Phytopathology, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, Canadian Journal of Microbiology and Australian Journal of Botany.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact