E.T. Wei

3.2k citations
69 papers · 2.9k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

E.T. Wei

66 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

E.T. Wei
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.3k
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 97
  • Sensory Systems 114
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 189
  • Cancer Research 178
Replace Thomas J. Haley with:
Thomas J. Haley United States
Tokio Yamaguchi Japan
Gianfranco Di Renzo Italy
Takuo Fujita Japan
Salvatore Amoroso Italy
J. Paul Hieble United States
Noboru Toda Japan
Milena Penkowa Denmark
Carl Pinsky Canada
Gin C. Hsieh United States
E.T. Wei relative to Thomas J. Haley United States Thomas J. Haley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Thomas J. Haley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.T. Wei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.T. Wei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.T. Wei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.T. Wei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.T. Wei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.T. Wei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.T. Wei. The network helps show where E.T. Wei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.T. Wei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.T. Wei Line = papers co-authored together E.T. Wei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1976394
2 2001212
3 1983133
4 1977126
5 1983111
6 1982107
7 198494
8 197791
9 197790
10 198290
11 198089
12 198386
13 200584
14 197872
15 198068
16 198260
17 198056
18 198756
19
Inhibition of mouse melanoma cell proliferation by corticotropin-releasing hormone and its analogs.
200152
20 197545

About E.T. Wei

E.T. Wei is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sensory Systems and Physiology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (43 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (6 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (3 papers), Ion Channels and Receptors (3 papers), Occupational and environmental lung diseases (3 papers) and Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.3k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (97 citations), Sensory Systems (114 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (189 citations) and Cancer Research (178 citations). E.T. Wei has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Horace H. Loh, Leon F. Tseng, W.G. Light, C H Li, Juliann Gong Kiang, J.K. Chang, Margherita Bergomi, Marco Vinceti, Carlotta Malagoli and G Vivoli. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Life Sciences, Regulatory Peptides, European Journal of Pharmacology and Peptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact