E.T. McAdams

1.3k citations
30 papers · 967 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

E.T. McAdams

29 papers receiving 929 citations

Peers

E.T. McAdams
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Mechanics of Materials 306
  • Materials Chemistry 384
  • Biomedical Engineering 341
  • Bioengineering 43
  • Electrochemistry 44
Replace Peter A Krulevitch with:
Peter A Krulevitch United States
Keisuke Nagato Japan
Mingrui Li China
Chunsheng Yang China
Zhiqiang Yu China
K. Rajanna India
Xiao Su China
Sunghan Kim South Korea
Wim Deferme Belgium
Haixia Yu China
E.T. McAdams relative to Peter A Krulevitch United States Peter A Krulevitch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Peter A Krulevitch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E.T. McAdams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E.T. McAdams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.T. McAdams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.T. McAdams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E.T. McAdams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.T. McAdams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.T. McAdams. The network helps show where E.T. McAdams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.T. McAdams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E.T. McAdams Line = papers co-authored together E.T. McAdams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005294
2 2002165
3 2005153
4 199653
5 200553
6 200236
7 200531
8 199323
9 199521
10 200421
11 199919
12 199819
13 201812
14 200612
15 200510
16 20027
17 19956
18 20095
19 19995
20
Neurosensors: A review of some fundamental electrode parameters
19924

About E.T. McAdams

E.T. McAdams is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Materials Chemistry, having authored 30 papers that have together received 967 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Muscle activation and electromyography studies (5 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (5 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (4 papers), Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research (4 papers), Metal and Thin Film Mechanics (3 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanics of Materials (306 citations), Materials Chemistry (384 citations), Biomedical Engineering (341 citations), Bioengineering (43 citations) and Electrochemistry (44 citations). E.T. McAdams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include James McLaughlin, Pagona Papakonstantinou, Patrick Lemoine, G. Delhomme, Fabrice Axisa, P.M. Schmitt, Claudine Géhin, A. Dittmar, Jinchao Zhao and J. Jossinet. Their work appears in journals such as Diamond and Related Materials, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, Thorax and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact