Esther Howe

496 citations
18 papers · 259 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Esther Howe

13 papers receiving 255 citations

Peers

Esther Howe
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 130
  • Human-Computer Interaction 21
  • Biological Psychiatry 8
  • Clinical Psychology 56
Replace Isa Rutten with:
Isa Rutten Belgium
Gudrun Eisele Belgium
Caitlin A. Stamatis United States
Lucile Dupuy France
Katharine E. Daniel United States
John Lurquin United States
Kevin S. Kuehn United States
Joanna Witowska Poland
Simon Provoost Netherlands
Pooja M. Desai United States
Esther Howe relative to Isa Rutten Belgium Isa Rutten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Isa Rutten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Esther Howe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Esther Howe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther Howe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther Howe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Esther Howe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther Howe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther Howe. The network helps show where Esther Howe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Esther Howe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Esther Howe Line = papers co-authored together Esther Howe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 202083
2 202268
3 202241
4 202224
5 202020
6 20236
7 20245
8 20243
9 20243
10 20222
11 19991
12 20221
13 20171
14 20171
15 20240
16 20250
17 20220
18 20250

About Esther Howe

Esther Howe is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions, having authored 18 papers that have together received 259 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (7 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Sleep and related disorders (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (99 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (130 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (21 citations), Biological Psychiatry (8 citations) and Clinical Psychology (56 citations). Esther Howe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Aaron J. Fisher, Jiyoung Song, Joshua R. Oltmanns, Jina Suh, Mary Czerwinski, Javier Hernandez, Gonzalo Ramos, Mehrab Bin Morshed, Hannah G. Bosley and Daniel McDuff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Traumatic Stress, JMIR Mental Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Behaviour Research and Therapy and European journal of psychotraumatology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact