Ernst Wolf

53 papers receiving 534 citations

Peers

Ernst Wolf
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Ophthalmology 207
  • Equine 18
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 196
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 41
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 123
Replace Dennis W. Siemsen with:
Dennis W. Siemsen United States
Luis Jiménez del Barco Spain
Christopher J. Murphy United States
Nancy J. Coletta United States
W Cadera Canada
Bo Lindström Sweden
Sanjeev Kasthurirangan United States
Richard Balliet United States
Bret A. Moore United States
George Smith Australia
Ernst Wolf relative to Dennis W. Siemsen United States Dennis W. Siemsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dennis W. Siemsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernst Wolf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernst Wolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernst Wolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernst Wolf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernst Wolf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernst Wolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernst Wolf. The network helps show where Ernst Wolf may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ernst Wolf, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ernst Wolf Line = papers co-authored together Ernst Wolf links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198347
2 198043
3 197242
4 197837
5 197237
6 199124
7 198323
8 198022
9
Studies on the shrinkage of the visual field with age
196720
10 198819
11 198319
12 195818
13 195917
14 198617
15 198116
16 198016
17 196715
18 195513
19 198113
20 197113

About Ernst Wolf

Ernst Wolf is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 641 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (16 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (6 papers), Religion, Theology, and Education (5 papers), Color Science and Applications (5 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (5 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers) and Corneal Surgery and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (207 citations), Equine (18 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (196 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (41 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (123 citations). Ernst Wolf has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Zigler, Elliott R. Jacobson, Nicholas J. Millichamp, Benjamin Bell, Charles D. Bernholz, David A. Wilkie, R. Santos-Anderson, David M. Miller, Henry David Abraham and Dennis E. Brooks. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vision Research, Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik, American Journal of Ophthalmology and Equine Veterinary Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact