Ernest Kramer

22 papers receiving 436 citations

Peers

Ernest Kramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Developmental Biology 59
  • General Psychology 28
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 146
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 189
  • Signal Processing 62
Replace James P. Wolz with:
James P. Wolz United States
Nicholas S. Thompson United States
Peter Wolff United States
Henry Maudsley
Peter G. Caryl United Kingdom
Julie J. Neiworth United States
Philip Howard Gray United States
Richard J. Sanders United States
Roger S. Fouts United States
Monja Knoll United Kingdom
Ernest Kramer relative to James P. Wolz United States James P. Wolz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.7×
James P. Wolz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ernest Kramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest Kramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest Kramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest Kramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest Kramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest Kramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest Kramer. The network helps show where Ernest Kramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ernest Kramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ernest Kramer Line = papers co-authored together Ernest Kramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1963136
2 196583
3 196480
4 198037
5 196427
6 196427
7 196918
8 196618
9 196817
10 196715
11 196612
12 196510
13 19697
14 19677
15 19667
16 19666
17 19706
18 19673
19 19823
20 19631

About Ernest Kramer

Ernest Kramer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (6 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (5 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (2 papers) and Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Biology (59 citations), General Psychology (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (146 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (189 citations) and Signal Processing (62 citations). Ernest Kramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Arthur A. Myrberg, William J. Bell, William G. Webster, Robyn M. Dawes, Paul S. Francis, G. Richard Tucker, William Brender, Sharon Klein and Peter Buirski. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, The Journal of Social Psychology, Psychotherapy, Journal of Chemical Ecology and Psychological Bulletin.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact