Eriko Ito

44 papers receiving 593 citations

Peers

Eriko Ito
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Environmental Engineering 169
  • Global and Planetary Change 242
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 138
  • Soil Science 84
  • Geology 44
Replace Qingwang Liu with:
Qingwang Liu China
Bruno Araújo Furtado de Mendonça Brazil
Tian Gao China
Yuhui Huang China
Christian Stiegler Germany
Eric C. Turnblom United States
Martin Klimánek Czechia
Yongming Lin China
Eder Souza Martins Brazil
Eriko Ito relative to Qingwang Liu China Qingwang Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Qingwang Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eriko Ito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eriko Ito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eriko Ito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eriko Ito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eriko Ito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eriko Ito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eriko Ito. The network helps show where Eriko Ito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eriko Ito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eriko Ito Line = papers co-authored together Eriko Ito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201596
2 200783
3 201237
4 201435
5 200731
6 201827
7 202125
8 200824
9 202023
10 201520
11 201116
12 201214
13 201514
14 202012
15 200712
16 201111
17 200811
18 200710
19 200810
20 20089

About Eriko Ito

Eriko Ito is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering, Soil Science and Water Science and Technology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 606 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (13 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (9 papers), Forest ecology and management (7 papers), Remote Sensing in Agriculture (7 papers), Soil and Unsaturated Flow (7 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Engineering (169 citations), Global and Planetary Change (242 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (138 citations), Soil Science (84 citations) and Geology (44 citations). Eriko Ito has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Cambodia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Sophal Chann, Maki Suzuki, Makoto Araki, Naoki Kabeya, Jumpei Toriyama, Akira Shimizu, Koji Tamai, Masaru Shimomura, Shohei Yamashita and Sadaaki Yamamoto. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Hydrological Processes, Journal of Pharmacological Sciences, Journal of Forest Research and Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact