Erik Stenman

568 citations
3 papers · 37 · h-index 3

Impact in

Papers in

Journals
Software Practice and Experience (1 paper)Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (1 paper)DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens) (1 paper)
Partner nations
SwedenSwitzerland

In The Last Decade

Erik Stenman

3 papers receiving 30 citations

Peers

Erik Stenman
Comparison fields: 5 of 11
  • Hardware and Architecture 21
  • Software 5
  • Artificial Intelligence 26
  • Computer Networks and Communications 13
  • Information Systems 12
Replace Chung-Shyan Liu with:
Chung-Shyan Liu Taiwan
Sadiq Jaffer United Kingdom
John W. Fendrich United States
Maximilian C. Bolingbroke United Kingdom
Michael Bursell
Baptiste Rozière France
Jim Schaad
Peter Deutsch United States
Lingfan Yu China
Robert Thurlow
Erik Stenman relative to Chung-Shyan Liu Taiwan Chung-Shyan Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×
Chung-Shyan Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Erik Stenman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Erik Stenman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Erik Stenman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Erik Stenman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Erik Stenman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Erik Stenman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Erik Stenman. The network helps show where Erik Stenman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Erik Stenman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Erik Stenman Line = papers co-authored together Erik Stenman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

3 of 3 papers shown
#Work
1
An Overview of the Scala Programming Language (2. Edition)
200624
2 20037
3 20026

About Erik Stenman

Erik Stenman is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Software, Media Technology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 3 papers that have together received 37 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (2 papers), Distributed systems and fault tolerance (1 paper), Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems (1 paper), Experimental Learning in Engineering (1 paper), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper) and Formal Methods in Verification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (21 citations), Software (5 citations), Artificial Intelligence (26 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (13 citations) and Information Systems (12 citations). Erik Stenman has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Konstantinos Sagonas, Burak Emir, Vincent Cremet, Sean McDirmid, Martin Odersky and Matthias Zenger. Their work appears in journals such as Software Practice and Experience, Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) and DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact