Eric R. Stone

47 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers

Eric R. Stone
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • General Decision Sciences 739
  • Applied Psychology 488
  • Safety Research 232
  • Developmental Biology 57
  • Marketing 157
Replace Gordon F. Pitz with:
Gordon F. Pitz United States
Anton Kühberger Austria
Nigel Harvey United Kingdom
Jonathan L. Freedman United States
R. Scott Tindale United States
Greg Barron United States
Maya Bar‐Hillel Israel
Craig R. M. McKenzie United States
Peter Ayton United Kingdom
Stephan Dickert United Kingdom
Eric R. Stone relative to Gordon F. Pitz United States Gordon F. Pitz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Gordon F. Pitz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric R. Stone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric R. Stone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric R. Stone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric R. Stone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric R. Stone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric R. Stone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric R. Stone. The network helps show where Eric R. Stone may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Eric R. Stone, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric R. Stone Line = papers co-authored together Eric R. Stone links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994280
2
The risk construct.
1992250
3 2003167
4 1997132
5 2003130
6 2003116
7 1994112
8 200897
9 200595
10 200286
11 200078
12 201367
13 201162
14 200560
15 198843
16 200340
17 201339
18 200038
19 200133
20 198932

About Eric R. Stone

Eric R. Stone is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 49 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (25 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (12 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (5 papers) and Risk Perception and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (739 citations), Applied Psychology (488 citations), Safety Research (232 citations), Developmental Biology (57 citations) and Marketing (157 citations). Eric R. Stone has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include J. Frank Yates, Andrew M. Parker, Paul C. Price, Mark V. Pezzo, Laura Wray‐Lake, Hal R. Arkes, Jane Nash, Cynthia A. Joyner, Wändi Bruine de Bruin and James A. Schirillo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Risk Analysis, Ornithological Applications and Judgment and Decision Making.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact