Eric M. Shaeffer

5 papers receiving 498 citations

Peers

Eric M. Shaeffer
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Decision Sciences 28
  • Applied Psychology 32
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 51
Replace Maureen Wang Erber with:
Maureen Wang Erber United States
Nicolas Koranyi Germany
Maya Rossignac‐Milon United States
Stefan E. Hormuth Germany
Christine Ma‐Kellams United States
John M. Govern United States
Etsuko Hoshino‐Browne United States
Julia Leah Briskin United States
Katja Rüter Germany
Rebecca Dyer United States
Eric M. Shaeffer relative to Maureen Wang Erber United States Maureen Wang Erber's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Maureen Wang Erber · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric M. Shaeffer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric M. Shaeffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric M. Shaeffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric M. Shaeffer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric M. Shaeffer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric M. Shaeffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric M. Shaeffer. The network helps show where Eric M. Shaeffer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Eric M. Shaeffer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric M. Shaeffer Line = papers co-authored together Eric M. Shaeffer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

About Eric M. Shaeffer

Eric M. Shaeffer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Automotive Engineering, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 528 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Action Observation and Synchronization (2 papers), Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (2 papers), Media Influence and Health (1 paper), Sport Psychology and Performance (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (28 citations), Applied Psychology (32 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (81 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (51 citations). Eric M. Shaeffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Richard P. Eibach, Lisa K. Libby, Mélanie Revilla, Willem Egbert Saris, Jon A. Krosnick, Jonathan A. Slemmer, Trevor N. Tompson, W. Michael Hanemann, Penny S. Visser and Jeffrey M. Wooldridge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology General, Environmental and Resource Economics, Survey research methods, Public Opinion Quarterly and Psychological Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact