Eric J. Engstrom

47 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Eric J. Engstrom
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Psychology 23
  • Philosophy 202
  • Neurology 100
  • Clinical Psychology 224
  • History 76
Replace Emil Kraepelin with:
Emil Kraepelin Brazil
Holger Steinberg Germany
Jack D. Pressman United States
Werner Janzarik Germany
JAMES P. CATTELL United States
Borut Škodlar Slovenia
Ulrich Schultz‐Venrath Germany
John Frosch United States
Paul Federn United States
Michael McCabe United States
Eric J. Engstrom relative to Emil Kraepelin Brazil Emil Kraepelin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Emil Kraepelin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eric J. Engstrom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eric J. Engstrom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric J. Engstrom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric J. Engstrom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eric J. Engstrom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric J. Engstrom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric J. Engstrom. The network helps show where Eric J. Engstrom may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Eric J. Engstrom, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eric J. Engstrom Line = papers co-authored together Eric J. Engstrom links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199739
2 201534
3 201630
4 201728
5 199124
6 200722
7 200217
8 200617
9 200516
10 200014
11 200714
12 202011
13 201011
14 201210
15 20078
16 20168
17 20137
18 20167
19 20216
20 20126

About Eric J. Engstrom

Eric J. Engstrom is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, History, Neurology and General Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (32 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (24 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (17 papers), Medical History and Research (17 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (7 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (6 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (3 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (23 citations), Philosophy (202 citations), Neurology (100 citations), Clinical Psychology (224 citations) and History (76 citations). Eric J. Engstrom has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth S. Kendler, Matthias M. Weber, Ivan Crozier, David J. Lederer, Volker Roelcke, Germán E. Berríos, Stephan Heckers, Claes Magnusson, Pernilla Hagbert and Troels Pedersen. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Psychiatry, Current Opinion in Psychiatry, Social History of Medicine, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry and Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact