Eric Harwit
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
- E-Government and Public Services
Papers in
-
- China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance 7
- Asian Industrial and Economic Development 4
-
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 3
- Socioeconomic Development in Asia 3
- Journals
- Asian Survey (4 papers)The China Quarterly (3 papers)Chinese Journal of Communication (2 papers)The China Journal (1 paper)Pacific Affairs (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelChina
In The Last Decade
Eric Harwit
21 papers receiving 434 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Communication 129
- Political Science and International Relations 204
- Media Technology 76
- Strategy and Management 89
- Business and International Management 11
Countries citing papers authored by Eric Harwit
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Harwit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Harwit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Harwit more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eric Harwit
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Harwit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Harwit. The network helps show where Eric Harwit may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Eric Harwit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 115 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1996 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 1 |
About Eric Harwit
Eric Harwit is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Media Technology and Communication, having authored 23 papers that have together received 479 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (7 papers), Asian Industrial and Economic Development (4 papers), Global trade and economics (4 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (3 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (3 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (3 papers), Social Media and Politics (2 papers) and Innovation and Knowledge Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (129 citations), Political Science and International Relations (204 citations), Media Technology (76 citations), Strategy and Management (89 citations) and Business and International Management (11 citations). Eric Harwit has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and China. Frequent co-authors include Yadong Luo, Mike W. Peng and Oded Shenkar. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, The China Quarterly, Chinese Journal of Communication, The China Journal and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.