Chinese Journal of Communication

6.0k citations
450 papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

    • Social Media and Politics
    • Media Studies and Communication
    • Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
    • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
    • Digital Marketing and Social Media
    • Digital Economy and Work Transformation

Papers in

    • Social Media and Politics 139
    • Media Studies and Communication 102
    • Public Relations and Crisis Communication 39
    • Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 68
    • Impact of Technology on Adolescents 39
    • Digital Marketing and Social Media 31

Chinese Journal of Communication

404 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers

Chinese Journal of Communication
Comparison fields: 5 of 138
  • Communication 1.9k
  • Sociology and Political Science 3.3k
  • Gender Studies 519
  • Marketing 477
  • Cultural Studies 433
Replace Anthropology of Work Review with:
Anthropology of Work Review United States
Policy & Internet United States
The Communication Review United States
Global Media and Communication United States
Discourse & Communication United Kingdom
Critical Policy Studies United Kingdom
Internet Policy Review Netherlands
International Journal of Cross Cultural Management United States
Critical Discourse Studies United Kingdom
Contemporary Social Science United Kingdom
Chinese Journal of Communication relative to Anthropology of Work Review United States Anthropology of Work Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.7×
Anthropology of Work Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Communication

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Communication more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication.

About Chinese Journal of Communication

The 450 papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication usually cover Communication (207 papers), Sociology and Political Science (267 papers), Cultural Studies (40 papers), Gender Studies (41 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (95 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (139 papers), Media Studies and Communication (102 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (68 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (60 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (39 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (39 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (37 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Communication are Ping Sun, Eric Harwit, Jean‐Christophe Plantin, Gabriele de Seta, Colin Sparks, Louis W. Leung, Francis Lap Fung Lee, Herman Wasserman, Guobin Yang and Jeroen de Kloet.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact