Countries where authors publish in Chinese Journal of Communication
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Chinese Journal of Communication. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chinese Journal of Communication more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication
This network shows the impact of papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication.
About Chinese Journal of Communication
The 508 papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication in the last decades have received a total of 6.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Chinese Journal of Communication usually cover Communication (218 papers), Sociology and Political Science (287 papers), Cultural Studies (51 papers), Gender Studies (43 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (105 papers) specifically the topics of Social Media and Politics (144 papers), Media Studies and Communication (108 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (85 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (67 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (48 papers), Public Relations and Crisis Communication (40 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (37 papers) and Digital Marketing and Social Media (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Chinese Journal of Communication are Ping Sun, Eric Harwit, Colin Sparks, Gabriele de Seta, Jean‐Christophe Plantin, Louis Leung, Francis Lee, Herman Wasserman, Hong Shen and Michael Curtin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.