E.N. van Loo
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 2%
- Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
- Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
Papers in
-
- Genetics and Plant Breeding 3
- Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies 3
-
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 4
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 3
- Co-authors
- Richard G. F. Visser (12 shared papers)C. Bachem (1 shared paper)Luisa M. Trindade (9 shared papers)Li‐Hua Zhu (3 shared papers)O. Dolstra (8 shared papers)Xueyuan Li (2 shared papers)Harm Bartholomeus (1 shared paper)Richard Finkers (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Plant Biotechnology Journal (4 papers)Frontiers in Plant Science (4 papers)BMC Plant Biology (3 papers)Industrial Crops and Products (2 papers)Scientific Reports (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsChinaGermany
In The Last Decade
E.N. van Loo
45 papers receiving 958 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Biochemistry 236
- Plant Science 545
- Agronomy and Crop Science 106
- Forestry 25
- Molecular Biology 370
Countries citing papers authored by E.N. van Loo
This map shows the geographic impact of E.N. van Loo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E.N. van Loo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E.N. van Loo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E.N. van Loo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E.N. van Loo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E.N. van Loo. The network helps show where E.N. van Loo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside E.N. van Loo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 116 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 114 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 111 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 85 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 59 | |
| 6 | 1992 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 52 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 43 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1992 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 13 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 13 |
About E.N. van Loo
E.N. van Loo is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, Agronomy and Crop Science and Genetics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (8 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers), Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals (3 papers), Genetics and Plant Breeding (3 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (3 papers), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (3 papers) and Seed and Plant Biochemistry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (236 citations), Plant Science (545 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (106 citations), Forestry (25 citations) and Molecular Biology (370 citations). E.N. van Loo has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, China and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Richard G. F. Visser, C. Bachem, Luisa M. Trindade, Li‐Hua Zhu, O. Dolstra, Xueyuan Li, Harm Bartholomeus, Richard Finkers, Marston H. D. Franceschini and H. Krämer. Their work appears in journals such as Plant Biotechnology Journal, Frontiers in Plant Science, BMC Plant Biology, Industrial Crops and Products and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.