Emma‐Jane Sayers
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Empathy and Medical Education
Papers in
-
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 2
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 2
- Co-authors
- Miles Little (9 shared papers)Christopher F. C. Jordens (8 shared papers)Kim Paul (3 shared papers)Kathleen A. Montgomery (1 shared paper)Michael Jefford (1 shared paper)Jennifer L. Malin (1 shared paper)Ian Kerridge (1 shared paper)John Miles Little (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Social Science & Medicine (3 papers)Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (2 papers)Psycho-Oncology (2 papers)Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (1 paper)Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma‐Jane Sayers
11 papers receiving 413 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Applied Psychology 46
- Psychiatry and Mental health 79
- Oncology 113
- General Health Professions 95
- Gender Studies 28
Countries citing papers authored by Emma‐Jane Sayers
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma‐Jane Sayers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma‐Jane Sayers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma‐Jane Sayers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma‐Jane Sayers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma‐Jane Sayers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma‐Jane Sayers. The network helps show where Emma‐Jane Sayers may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Emma‐Jane Sayers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 167 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 72 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 45 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 10 | Restoring Humane Values to Medicine: A Miles Little Reader | 2003 | 5 |
| 11 | 2022 | 4 |
About Emma‐Jane Sayers
Emma‐Jane Sayers is a scholar working on Philosophy, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Gender Studies and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 11 papers that have together received 465 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers), Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (1 paper) and Legal and cultural studies analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (46 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations), Oncology (113 citations), General Health Professions (95 citations) and Gender Studies (28 citations). Emma‐Jane Sayers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miles Little, Christopher F. C. Jordens, Kim Paul, Kathleen A. Montgomery, Michael Jefford, Jennifer L. Malin, Ian Kerridge and John Miles Little. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine and Journal of Bioethical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.