Chiara Fioretti

31 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers

Chiara Fioretti
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Applied Psychology 61
  • Clinical Psychology 115
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 81
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
  • Health Information Management 17
Replace Gabriele Lucius-Hoene with:
Gabriele Lucius-Hoene Germany
Charee M. Thompson United States
Deborah Lancastle United Kingdom
Chueh Chang Taiwan
Sandra Sexson United States
Marie Leiner United States
Katherine E. Dorociak United States
Sara Santarossa Canada
Naved Iqbal India
Chiara Fioretti relative to Gabriele Lucius-Hoene Germany Gabriele Lucius-Hoene's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Gabriele Lucius-Hoene · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chiara Fioretti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chiara Fioretti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiara Fioretti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiara Fioretti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chiara Fioretti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiara Fioretti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiara Fioretti. The network helps show where Chiara Fioretti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chiara Fioretti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chiara Fioretti Line = papers co-authored together Chiara Fioretti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016100
2 202066
3 201643
4 201628
5 201527
6 201527
7 201725
8 201923
9 201620
10 201618
11 201615
12 198915
13 201513
14 201610
15 20179
16 20199
17 20228
18 20227
19 20195
20 20164

About Chiara Fioretti

Chiara Fioretti is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Support in Illness (10 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (7 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (5 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (4 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (3 papers) and Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (61 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (81 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations) and Health Information Management (17 citations). Chiara Fioretti has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Smorti, Gabriella Pravettoni, Serena Oliveri, Marianna Masiero, Silvia Riva, Ketti Mazzocco, Annalaura Nocentini, Ersilia Menesini, Benedetta Emanuela Palladino and Chiara Renzi. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, BMJ Open, Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, Inflammation Research and Journal of Youth Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact