Emma Smith
Impact in
- Immunology top 10%
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction
- Immune Response and Inflammation
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Cancer Research top 10%
- NF-κB Signaling Pathways
Papers in
- Genetics 6
- Diabetes and associated disorders 6
-
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses 2
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology 2
- Co-authors
- Ruaidhrı́ J. Carmody (3 shared papers)Christian Frank (1 shared paper)Mark Peakman (5 shared papers)C. Michael R. Turner (2 shared papers)Martyn K. Robinson (1 shared paper)Helene M. Finney (1 shared paper)Andrew Nesbitt (1 shared paper)Fred Ramsdell (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Diabetes (2 papers)Parasitology (2 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Australasian Journal of Dermatology (1 paper)Journal of Biological Chemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Emma Smith
14 papers receiving 909 citations
Emma Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Immunology 282
- Cancer Research 158
- Biological Psychiatry 13
- Neurology 44
- Epidemiology 151
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Smith. The network helps show where Emma Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Regulation of NF-κB Subunits by Phosphorylation Hit paper breakdown → | 2016 | 589 |
| 2 | 1990 | 75 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 53 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 17 | |
| 8 | 1991 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2024 | 0 |
About Emma Smith
Emma Smith is a scholar working on Genetics, Immunology, Molecular Biology, Surgery and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 15 papers that have together received 919 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diabetes and associated disorders (6 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (4 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (4 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (3 papers), NF-κB Signaling Pathways (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Trypanosoma species research and implications (2 papers) and T-cell and B-cell Immunology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (282 citations), Cancer Research (158 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations), Neurology (44 citations) and Epidemiology (151 citations). Emma Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ruaidhrı́ J. Carmody, Christian Frank, Mark Peakman, C. Michael R. Turner, Martyn K. Robinson, Helene M. Finney, Andrew Nesbitt, Fred Ramsdell, Andrew Tait and Geoff Hide. Their work appears in journals such as Diabetes, Parasitology, Scientific Reports, Australasian Journal of Dermatology and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.