Emma Simpson
Impact in
-
- Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Congenital heart defects research
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
Papers in
- Surgery 2
- Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine 2
-
- Congenital heart defects research 2
- Co-authors
- Eric N. Olson (3 shared papers)Enzo R. Porrello (3 shared papers)Hesham A. Sadek (2 shared papers)Ahmed I. Mahmoud (2 shared papers)James A. Richardson (1 shared paper)Joseph A. Hill (1 shared paper)Brett A. Johnson (2 shared papers)Pradeep P.A. Mammen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Animal Science (2 papers)Circulation Research (1 paper)Reproduction Fertility and Development (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaNorway
In The Last Decade
Emma Simpson
8 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Emma Simpson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 674
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Cancer Research 451
- Surgery 944
- Cell Biology 190
Countries citing papers authored by Emma Simpson
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Simpson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Simpson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Simpson. The network helps show where Emma Simpson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transient Regenerative Potential of the Neonatal Mouse Heart Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 1871 |
| 2 | Regulation of neonatal and adult mammalian heart regeneration by the miR-15 family Hit paper breakdown → | 2012 | 570 |
| 3 | 2011 | 347 | |
| 4 | 1957 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1962 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 2 |
About Emma Simpson
Emma Simpson is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Agronomy and Crop Science and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital heart defects research (2 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (2 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (2 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (2 papers), Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior (1 paper), Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper) and Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (674 citations), Molecular Biology (2.3k citations), Cancer Research (451 citations), Surgery (944 citations) and Cell Biology (190 citations). Emma Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Eric N. Olson, Enzo R. Porrello, Hesham A. Sadek, Ahmed I. Mahmoud, James A. Richardson, Joseph A. Hill, Brett A. Johnson, Pradeep P.A. Mammen, Beverly A. Rothermel and Diana C. Canseco. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Animal Science, Circulation Research, Reproduction Fertility and Development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.